Re: Why you might want packages not containers for Ceph deployments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Am 17.11.21 um 20:14 schrieb Marc:
> >> a good choice. It lacks RBD encryption and read leases. But for us
> >> upgrading from N to O or P is currently not
> >>
> > what about just using osd encryption with N?
> 
> 
> That would be Data at Rest encryption only. The keys for the OSDs are
> stored on the mons. Data is transferred unencrypted over the wire.
> 
> RBD encryption takes place in the client.
> 

Very very nice security policy you have!
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux