We also use containers for ceph and love it. If for some reason we couldn't run ceph this way any longer, we would probably migrate everything to a different solution. We are absolutely committed to containerization. I understand some people don't like them, and that's okay too. But if we're soliciting input from containerized ceph users, you can add my site to the list. It might be worth noting that we layer our own startup scripts on top of the base ceph/ceph containers; we don't use the scripts in ceph/daemon. ________________________________ From: Hans van den Bogert <hansbogert@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 15:33 To: ceph-users@xxxxxxx Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Why you might want packages not containers for Ceph deployments On 11/17/21 8:19 PM, Martin Verges wrote: > There are still alternative solutions without the need for useless > containers and added complexity. Stay away from that crap and you won't > have a hard time. 😜 I don't have a problem with the containers *at all*. And with me probably a lot of users. But those who don't see the problem are silent in this thread. I love cephadm, finally spinning up a cluster and doing upgrades has become a lot less tedious. A positive sound was in due order here. Signing out again! Hans _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |