Re: Why you might want packages not containers for Ceph deployments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> * I personally wouldn't want to run an LTS release based on ... what would
> that be now.. Luminous + security patches??. IMO, the new releases really
> are much more performant, much more scalable. N, O, and P are really much
> much *much* better than previous releases. For example, I would not enable
> snapshots on any cephfs except Pacific -- but do we really want to backport
> the "stray dir splitting" improvement all the way back to mimic or L? -- to
> me that seems extremely unwise and a waste of the developers' limited time.

Then again, I am hit by the 13.2.7+ bug
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/43259 on one Mimic cluster.

>From what I can divine, it is a regression where some other fix or
feature for rgw caused CopyObject to start failing for S3 clusters
after 13.2.7.
No fix or revert was done for mimic. Nor Nautilus. Then those two
releases "timed out" and aren't considered worth the developers time
anymore, so the ticket just got bumped to "fix later, and backport to
Oct and Pac when that is done."

So, while I would have liked to simply upgrade to N,O,P to fix this,
none of them has the fix currently, so upgrading the cluster will not
help me, and the N->O bump will incur one of those "an hour or more
per hdd OSD" conversions which are kind of sad to plan for, and as we
know the Pac release is currently not a fun place to upgrade into
either.

In my dream world, an LTS would not have seen a feature break another,
and if it wasn't a feature but some fix for something else then
someone would have to make a decision if it is ok to cause one bug to
fix another and revert the fix if it wasn't ok to break old features.
As is it now, a third option was possible, to let it slip and not-fix
it at all and just tag it for later because so much else has changed
by now. It got "fixed" in master after almost two years but the
backports to O+P has been stale for 4 months, which means I will have
to make several jumps and then move to Q early on when it arrives in
order to get back to the working setup I had at 13.2.6..

This is at least my reason for wanting something like an LTS version.


-- 
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux