Just need the following two PRs merged and then ACK for QE: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 24/08/2016 17:30, Jason Dillaman wrote: >> +1 -- results look as expected. > > Cool :-) Backports were merged, is there anything else you need ? Or can it be passed to QE ? > >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ >>> >>> On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>> OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it >>>> builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick >>>> it off. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 >>>>> >>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>>>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>>>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>>>>>> PRs: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> >> >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
