Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) Cheers On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: > If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following > included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 > > ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, > I would also like to include the following which already have open > PRs: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 > > I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> >> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >> >> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
