On 24/08/2016 19:40, Jason Dillaman wrote: > Just need the following two PRs merged and then ACK for QE: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 > Done. Not sure why I missed them, good catch. > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> On 24/08/2016 17:30, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>> +1 -- results look as expected. >> >> Cool :-) Backports were merged, is there anything else you need ? Or can it be passed to QE ? >> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ >>>> >>>> On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>> OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it >>>>> builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick >>>>> it off. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>>>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>>>>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>>>>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>>>>>>> PRs: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
