On 24/08/2016 17:30, Jason Dillaman wrote: > +1 -- results look as expected. Cool :-) Backports were merged, is there anything else you need ? Or can it be passed to QE ? > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ >> >> On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>> OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it >>> builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick >>> it off. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 >>>> >>>> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >>>>> >>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>>>>> PRs: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
