On 08/24/2016 12:41 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
Hey Casey,
are all the multisite fixes we wanted in?
There are still a few pending backport, including 3 in particular that
fix segfaults:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16901
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16864
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16696
It looks like that last one is blocked by conflicts with the tenant
support backport in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16702. I'll rebase
that one and open a PR.
Casey
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Yehuda,
The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-27 except for two failures). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
