On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Noah Watkins <noahwatkins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've put up cls-lua-syslib branch that builds against the distro-provided > version of Lua. It's currently assuming Lua 5.1 which is a choice on Ubuntu > (along with 5.2), and appears to be only version available on CentOS 7. My > Fedora 24 box only has Lua 5.3. What are the range of platforms that need > support? Supporting multiple versions of Lua isn't a good idea. I suggest sticking with Lua 5.3. [This has the consequence of making LuaJIT unsupported by cls-lua but I'm personally okay with that. There isn't any strong reason to maintain support with LuaJIT and it lacks many new Lua facilities we will want (like string.pack).] Is it not okay to require distributions to build our bundled Lua if they don't have 5.3 in their repos? -- Patrick Donnelly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
