Re: Questions about embedding Lua in the Ceph source tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We should definitely try to limit changes to Lua unless it's
> absolutely necessary. I haven't seen a good reason yet so I suggest
> using bare upstream so maintainers can use the system liblua if
> desired.

We have put together versions of the Lua branch for system liblua,
embed (current approach), and LuaJIT and the deltas are very small.
I'll toss up a version that links against system liblua. IIRC we had a
motivation for compiling our own version, so that should reveal itself
if it really existed :)

>
> --
> Patrick Donnelly
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux