Never mind. I just realized that it will be easier to build it on top of the latest master in any case. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Victor Denisov <vdenisov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jason, > > Do you prefer pull requests to be rebased on top of the latest master > or should I keep it where I started the development? > > Thanks, > V. > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Jason Dillaman <jdillama@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Victor Denisov <vdenisov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Jason, >>> >>> Do you have any opinion regarding deleting images that are in a >>> consistency group? >>> >>> Should we delete them as well as the references in the consistency >>> group they belong to or should we prohibit deleting images that are in >>> a consistency group? >>> >>> V. >>> >> >> Right now, if an image has a snapshot we required you to remove all >> snapshots before removing the image. Along those lines, if an image >> is in a consistency group and the consistency group has snapshots, the >> user wouldn't be able to remove the image since it has snapshots nor >> should the user be able to remove the snapshots associated with the >> consistency group. In this case, the user would be forced to >> dissociate the image from the group before attempting to delete it. >> Therefore, just to keep the actions consistent, you might as well >> force the user to dissociate an image from the consistency group even >> if the image doesn't have snapshots. >> >> >> -- >> Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
