Jason, Do you prefer pull requests to be rebased on top of the latest master or should I keep it where I started the development? Thanks, V. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Jason Dillaman <jdillama@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Victor Denisov <vdenisov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Jason, >> >> Do you have any opinion regarding deleting images that are in a >> consistency group? >> >> Should we delete them as well as the references in the consistency >> group they belong to or should we prohibit deleting images that are in >> a consistency group? >> >> V. >> > > Right now, if an image has a snapshot we required you to remove all > snapshots before removing the image. Along those lines, if an image > is in a consistency group and the consistency group has snapshots, the > user wouldn't be able to remove the image since it has snapshots nor > should the user be able to remove the snapshots associated with the > consistency group. In this case, the user would be forced to > dissociate the image from the group before attempting to delete it. > Therefore, just to keep the actions consistent, you might as well > force the user to dissociate an image from the consistency group even > if the image doesn't have snapshots. > > > -- > Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
