On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here >>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13356#note-61 >>>> >>>> The following suites were in scope of this point release testing: >>>> >>>> rados (subset 1/7) >>>> rbd >>>> rgw >>>> fs >>>> krbd >>>> kcephfs >>>> hadoop >>>> samba >>>> rest >>>> ceph-deploy >>>> upgrade/client-upgrade >>>> upgrade/dumpling-firefly-x (hammer) >>>> upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) >>>> upgrade/hammer >>>> upgrade/hammer-x (infernalis) >>>> powercycle >>>> >>>> Outstanding issues (approval requested): >>>> >>>> fs: >>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14716 - Greg, do you want those to be >>>> fixed for this release or approve release as is with a known issue? >>>> >>>> samba: >>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14714 - Greg, do you want those to be >>>> fixed for this release or approve release as is with a known issue? >> >> Okay, I looked briefly at the samba issue and honestly I'm just not >> that fussed about it. I'm a little concerned by the thread assert, >> although the fact that it's happening on shutdown anyway mitigates it >> some... >> I suppose I wouldn't call it a release blocker, but it's not a great >> precedent to set. I think ideally you'd want to try and identify where >> it happened — is it a genuinely new issue, or something showing up on >> the smithi boxes but not other hardware? >> You might check that by running this on the miras and/or ovh, and by >> running the version that last passed on ovh against smithi and seeing >> if/where the issues show up. >> -Greg > > OK, Greg, I will try rerunning samba jobs in suggested environments > and we will see more info. > > Are you still looking into the fs issue http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14716 14716 is what I'm referring to when I talk about running the tests elsewhere. :) I'm not looking at it actively right now but will take the results of any bisecting tests to try and track it down further. -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
