On 14-2-2016 20:46, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm having a bit of trouble in finding the actual error in >> >> https://jenkins.ceph.com/job/ceph-pull-requests/1419/console >> >> The first few python warning/errors seem harmless, because the tests >> are actually run. >> Then 'bash -x tests/ceph-disk.sh' is run, which generates a lot of >> output. But I'm missing the point where that generates an error. >> >> Could somebody help me point out where the error is that makes this test >> fail?? >> >> The test ATM fails under FreeBSD because of other errors still in some >> of the scripts and programs.. >> So testing it there doest not even get as far as this point. > > Search for "FAIL:" and you get: >> FAIL: ceph-disk/run-tox.sh Yup, run-tox.sh is rather a collection of tests run under tox supervision. And it ends in running tests/ceph-disks.sh.... I've augmented the script to actually print the status value of the test executions. So: tests/ceph-disk.sh:386: run: status=0 tells me that all components are executed and completed successfully. Still leaving me to wonder why run-tox.sh concludes that there has been an error.... > and then farther down a big block of output from that test. It's angry > about a bunch of python syntax issues. > There's also what looks like an unexpected network disconnect at the > end; we've been having network troubles and the jenkins bot is failing > intermittently. I found the argy puthon murmers, but these do not trigger on my Centos7 platform. Even though they are pressent in the logfiles. Thanx for helping, --WjW -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html