See updates in 14716, in short it's persisting on different systems. This is the only remaining issue before we can proceed with this release. Thx YuriW On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Hello >>>>> >>>>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here >>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13356#note-61 >>>>> >>>>> The following suites were in scope of this point release testing: >>>>> >>>>> rados (subset 1/7) >>>>> rbd >>>>> rgw >>>>> fs >>>>> krbd >>>>> kcephfs >>>>> hadoop >>>>> samba >>>>> rest >>>>> ceph-deploy >>>>> upgrade/client-upgrade >>>>> upgrade/dumpling-firefly-x (hammer) >>>>> upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) >>>>> upgrade/hammer >>>>> upgrade/hammer-x (infernalis) >>>>> powercycle >>>>> >>>>> Outstanding issues (approval requested): >>>>> >>>>> fs: >>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14716 - Greg, do you want those to be >>>>> fixed for this release or approve release as is with a known issue? >>>>> >>>>> samba: >>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14714 - Greg, do you want those to be >>>>> fixed for this release or approve release as is with a known issue? >>> >>> Okay, I looked briefly at the samba issue and honestly I'm just not >>> that fussed about it. I'm a little concerned by the thread assert, >>> although the fact that it's happening on shutdown anyway mitigates it >>> some... >>> I suppose I wouldn't call it a release blocker, but it's not a great >>> precedent to set. I think ideally you'd want to try and identify where >>> it happened — is it a genuinely new issue, or something showing up on >>> the smithi boxes but not other hardware? >>> You might check that by running this on the miras and/or ovh, and by >>> running the version that last passed on ovh against smithi and seeing >>> if/where the issues show up. >>> -Greg >> >> OK, Greg, I will try rerunning samba jobs in suggested environments >> and we will see more info. >> >> Are you still looking into the fs issue http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14716 > > 14716 is what I'm referring to when I talk about running the tests > elsewhere. :) I'm not looking at it actively right now but will take > the results of any bisecting tests to try and track it down further. > -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
