On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello >> >> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13356#note-61 >> >> The following suites were in scope of this point release testing: >> >> rados (subset 1/7) >> rbd >> rgw >> fs >> krbd >> kcephfs >> hadoop >> samba >> rest >> ceph-deploy >> upgrade/client-upgrade >> upgrade/dumpling-firefly-x (hammer) >> upgrade/firefly-x (hammer) >> upgrade/hammer >> upgrade/hammer-x (infernalis) >> powercycle >> >> Outstanding issues (approval requested): >> >> fs: >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14716 - Greg, do you want those to be >> fixed for this release or approve release as is with a known issue? >> >> samba: >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14714 - Greg, do you want those to be >> fixed for this release or approve release as is with a known issue? Okay, I looked briefly at the samba issue and honestly I'm just not that fussed about it. I'm a little concerned by the thread assert, although the fact that it's happening on shutdown anyway mitigates it some... I suppose I wouldn't call it a release blocker, but it's not a great precedent to set. I think ideally you'd want to try and identify where it happened — is it a genuinely new issue, or something showing up on the smithi boxes but not other hardware? You might check that by running this on the miras and/or ovh, and by running the version that last passed on ovh against smithi and seeing if/where the issues show up. -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
