The only issue with not having wip-11139-firefly merged is getting false
test failures. So I can't see how this would impact the point release.
David
On 5/5/15 2:17 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi David,
These changes have been merged in ceph-qa-suite for about two weeks now, did you notice problems ?
Cheers
On 22/04/2015 06:25, David Zafman wrote:
All the changes for testing are in ceph-qa-suite firefly branch.
After updating from the git repo, the firefly branch doesn't include these 2 commits. Was there an issue with this change?
David
commit 71624947a338dabb6ed71d94e2e003bf984074cc
Merge: 3da69ba 35ee8e0
Author: Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Apr 3 10:47:42 2015 +0200
Merge pull request #394 from dzafman/wip-11139-firefly
ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool import
Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 35ee8e0d4e1e8cac61ff9f5d8d644f93de4cdf60
Author: David Zafman <dzafman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Mar 20 19:56:55 2015 -0700
ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool import
Fixes: #11139
Signed-off-by: David Zafman <dzafman@xxxxxxxxxx>
(cherry picked from commit 6c5300552d00232d6ecb2c1aa641d515c9d8cd34)
David
On 4/21/15 7:39 PM, Samuel Just wrote:
Ok, so ceoh_objectstrore_tool is being tested in firefly as part of the current firefly ceph-qa-suite branch?
-Sam
Sent from Nine <http://www.9folders.com/>
*From:* David Zafman
*Sent:* Apr 21, 2015 10:16 PM
*To:* Sage Weil;Loic Dachary
*Cc:* Ceph Development;Shu, Xinxin;sjust@xxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ?
In early march I ran rados:thrash on the firefly backport of the
ceph-objectstore-tool changes (wip-cot-firefly). We considered it
passed, even though an obscure segfault was seen:
bug #11141: Segmentation Violation: ceph-objectstore-tool doing --op
list-pgs
David
On 4/21/15 8:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get into a
release, IMO. David, are these being tested in the firefly thrashing
tests yet?
The only other one I'm worried about is
6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup
Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefly folks
who upgrade too?
sage
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Sage,
The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests in the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and are being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-integration-branch-april-2015 ).
Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Should we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backporting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ?
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
