Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




In early march I ran rados:thrash on the firefly backport of the ceph-objectstore-tool changes (wip-cot-firefly). We considered it passed, even though an obscure segfault was seen:

bug #11141: Segmentation Violation: ceph-objectstore-tool doing --op list-pgs

David


On 4/21/15 8:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get into a
release, IMO.  David, are these being tested in the firefly thrashing
tests yet?

The only other one I'm worried about is

6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup

Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefly folks
who upgrade too?

sage


On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote:

Hi Sage,

The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests in the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and are being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-integration-branch-april-2015 ).

Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Should we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backporting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ?

Cheers

--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux