Hi David, These changes have been merged in ceph-qa-suite for about two weeks now, did you notice problems ? Cheers On 22/04/2015 06:25, David Zafman wrote: > > All the changes for testing are in ceph-qa-suite firefly branch. > > After updating from the git repo, the firefly branch doesn't include these 2 commits. Was there an issue with this change? > > David > > commit 71624947a338dabb6ed71d94e2e003bf984074cc > Merge: 3da69ba 35ee8e0 > Author: Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Apr 3 10:47:42 2015 +0200 > > Merge pull request #394 from dzafman/wip-11139-firefly > > ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool import > > Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@xxxxxxxxxx> > > commit 35ee8e0d4e1e8cac61ff9f5d8d644f93de4cdf60 > Author: David Zafman <dzafman@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Mar 20 19:56:55 2015 -0700 > > ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool import > > Fixes: #11139 > > Signed-off-by: David Zafman <dzafman@xxxxxxxxxx> > (cherry picked from commit 6c5300552d00232d6ecb2c1aa641d515c9d8cd34) > > David > > On 4/21/15 7:39 PM, Samuel Just wrote: >> >> Ok, so ceoh_objectstrore_tool is being tested in firefly as part of the current firefly ceph-qa-suite branch? >> -Sam >> >> Sent from Nine <http://www.9folders.com/> >> >> *From:* David Zafman >> *Sent:* Apr 21, 2015 10:16 PM >> *To:* Sage Weil;Loic Dachary >> *Cc:* Ceph Development;Shu, Xinxin;sjust@xxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? >> >> >> >> In early march I ran rados:thrash on the firefly backport of the >> ceph-objectstore-tool changes (wip-cot-firefly). We considered it >> passed, even though an obscure segfault was seen: >> >> bug #11141: Segmentation Violation: ceph-objectstore-tool doing --op >> list-pgs >> >> David >> >> >> On 4/21/15 8:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> > The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get into a >> > release, IMO. David, are these being tested in the firefly thrashing >> > tests yet? >> > >> > The only other one I'm worried about is >> > >> > 6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup >> > >> > Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefly folks >> > who upgrade too? >> > >> > sage >> > >> > >> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Sage, >> >> >> >> The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests in the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and are being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-integration-branch-april-2015 ). >> >> >> >> Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Should we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backporting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ? >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
