On 05/05/2015 20:58, David Zafman wrote: > > The only issue with not having wip-11139-firefly merged is getting false test failures. So I can't see how this would impact the point release. > wip-11139-firefly is an hypothetical branch, right ? > David > > > On 5/5/15 2:17 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> These changes have been merged in ceph-qa-suite for about two weeks now, did you notice problems ? >> >> Cheers >> >> On 22/04/2015 06:25, David Zafman wrote: >>> All the changes for testing are in ceph-qa-suite firefly branch. >>> >>> After updating from the git repo, the firefly branch doesn't include these 2 commits. Was there an issue with this change? >>> >>> David >>> >>> commit 71624947a338dabb6ed71d94e2e003bf984074cc >>> Merge: 3da69ba 35ee8e0 >>> Author: Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Fri Apr 3 10:47:42 2015 +0200 >>> >>> Merge pull request #394 from dzafman/wip-11139-firefly >>> >>> ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool import >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> commit 35ee8e0d4e1e8cac61ff9f5d8d644f93de4cdf60 >>> Author: David Zafman <dzafman@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Fri Mar 20 19:56:55 2015 -0700 >>> >>> ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool import >>> >>> Fixes: #11139 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David Zafman <dzafman@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> (cherry picked from commit 6c5300552d00232d6ecb2c1aa641d515c9d8cd34) >>> >>> David >>> >>> On 4/21/15 7:39 PM, Samuel Just wrote: >>>> Ok, so ceoh_objectstrore_tool is being tested in firefly as part of the current firefly ceph-qa-suite branch? >>>> -Sam >>>> >>>> Sent from Nine <http://www.9folders.com/> >>>> >>>> *From:* David Zafman >>>> *Sent:* Apr 21, 2015 10:16 PM >>>> *To:* Sage Weil;Loic Dachary >>>> *Cc:* Ceph Development;Shu, Xinxin;sjust@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> *Subject:* Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> In early march I ran rados:thrash on the firefly backport of the >>>> ceph-objectstore-tool changes (wip-cot-firefly). We considered it >>>> passed, even though an obscure segfault was seen: >>>> >>>> bug #11141: Segmentation Violation: ceph-objectstore-tool doing --op >>>> list-pgs >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/21/15 8:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >>>>> The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get into a >>>>> release, IMO. David, are these being tested in the firefly thrashing >>>>> tests yet? >>>>> >>>>> The only other one I'm worried about is >>>>> >>>>> 6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup >>>>> >>>>> Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefly folks >>>>> who upgrade too? >>>>> >>>>> sage >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sage, >>>>>> >>>>>> The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests in the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and are being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-integration-branch-april-2015 ). >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Should we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backporting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>> >>>> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
