Re: snap_trimming + backfilling is inefficient with many purged_snaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It's in giant, the firefly backport will happen once we are happy with
the fallout from the 80.7 thing.
-Sam

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Dan Van Der Ster
<daniel.vanderster@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
>> On 19 Sep 2014, at 17:37, Dan Van Der Ster <daniel.vanderster@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> September 19 2014 5:19 PM, "Sage Weil" <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Dan van der Ster wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Dan Van Der Ster
>>>> <daniel.vanderster@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> On 19 Sep 2014, at 08:12, Florian Haas <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Sage,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> was the off-list reply intentional?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whoops! Nope :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> So, disaster is a pretty good description. Would anyone from the core
>>>>>>>>>> team like to suggest another course of action or workaround, or are
>>>>>>>>>> Dan and I generally on the right track to make the best out of a
>>>>>>>>>> pretty bad situation?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The short term fix would probably be to just prevent backfill for the time
>>>>>>>>> being until the bug is fixed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As in, osd max backfills = 0?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just managed to reproduce the problem...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sage
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Saw the wip branch. Color me freakishly impressed on the turnaround. :) Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed :) Thanks Sage!
>>>>> wip-9487-dumpling fixes the problem on my test cluster. Trying in prod now?
>>>>
>>>> Final update, after 4 hours in prod and after draining 8 OSDs -- zero
>>>> slow requests :)
>>>
>>> That's great news!
>>>
>>> But, please be careful. This code hasn't been reiewed yet or been through
>>> any testing! I would hold off on further backfills until it's merged.
>
>
> Any news on those merges? It would be good to get this fixed on the dumpling and firefly branches. We're kind of stuck at the moment :(
>
> Cheers, Dan
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux