Re: snap_trimming + backfilling is inefficient with many purged_snaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Dan Van Der Ster
<daniel.vanderster@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 19 Sep 2014, at 08:12, Florian Haas <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
>>>> Hi Sage,
>>>>
>>>> was the off-list reply intentional?
>>>
>>> Whoops!  Nope :)
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> So, disaster is a pretty good description. Would anyone from the core
>>>>>> team like to suggest another course of action or workaround, or are
>>>>>> Dan and I generally on the right track to make the best out of a
>>>>>> pretty bad situation?
>>>>>
>>>>> The short term fix would probably be to just prevent backfill for the time
>>>>> being until the bug is fixed.
>>>>
>>>> As in, osd max backfills = 0?
>>>
>>> Yeah :)
>>>
>>> Just managed to reproduce the problem...
>>>
>>> sage
>>
>> Saw the wip branch. Color me freakishly impressed on the turnaround. :) Thanks!
>
> Indeed :) Thanks Sage!
> wip-9487-dumpling fixes the problem on my test cluster. Trying in prod now…

Final update, after 4 hours in prod and after draining 8 OSDs -- zero
slow requests :)

Thanks again!

Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux