Re: snap_trimming + backfilling is inefficient with many purged_snaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> was the off-list reply intentional?
>
> Whoops!  Nope :)
>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> So, disaster is a pretty good description. Would anyone from the core
>> >> team like to suggest another course of action or workaround, or are
>> >> Dan and I generally on the right track to make the best out of a
>> >> pretty bad situation?
>> >
>> > The short term fix would probably be to just prevent backfill for the time
>> > being until the bug is fixed.
>>
>> As in, osd max backfills = 0?
>
> Yeah :)
>
> Just managed to reproduce the problem...
>
> sage

Saw the wip branch. Color me freakishly impressed on the turnaround. :) Thanks!

Cheers,
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux