Re: snap_trimming + backfilling is inefficient with many purged_snaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 19 Sep 2014, at 08:12, Florian Haas <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
>>> Hi Sage,
>>> 
>>> was the off-list reply intentional?
>> 
>> Whoops!  Nope :)
>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> So, disaster is a pretty good description. Would anyone from the core
>>>>> team like to suggest another course of action or workaround, or are
>>>>> Dan and I generally on the right track to make the best out of a
>>>>> pretty bad situation?
>>>> 
>>>> The short term fix would probably be to just prevent backfill for the time
>>>> being until the bug is fixed.
>>> 
>>> As in, osd max backfills = 0?
>> 
>> Yeah :)
>> 
>> Just managed to reproduce the problem...
>> 
>> sage
> 
> Saw the wip branch. Color me freakishly impressed on the turnaround. :) Thanks!

Indeed :) Thanks Sage!
wip-9487-dumpling fixes the problem on my test cluster. Trying in prod now…
Cheers, Dan��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f





[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux