Re: snap_trimming + backfilling is inefficient with many purged_snaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
> Hi Sage,
> 
> was the off-list reply intentional?

Whoops!  Nope :)

> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> So, disaster is a pretty good description. Would anyone from the core
> >> team like to suggest another course of action or workaround, or are
> >> Dan and I generally on the right track to make the best out of a
> >> pretty bad situation?
> >
> > The short term fix would probably be to just prevent backfill for the time
> > being until the bug is fixed.
> 
> As in, osd max backfills = 0?

Yeah :)

Just managed to reproduce the problem...

sage

> > The root of the problem seems to be that it is trying to trim snaps that
> > aren't there.  I'm trying to reproduce the issue now!  Hopefully the fix
> > is simple...
> >
> >         http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9487
> >
> > Thanks!
> > sage
> 
> Thanks. :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Florian
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux