On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sam and I discussed this on IRC and have we think two simpler patches that > solve the problem more directly. See wip-9487. So I understand this makes Dan's patch (and the config parameter that it introduces) unnecessary, but is it correct to assume that just like Dan's patch yours too will not be effective unless osd snap trim sleep > 0? > Queued for testing now. > Once that passes we can backport and test for firefly and dumpling too. > > Note that this won't make the next dumpling or firefly point releases > (which are imminent). Should be in the next ones, though. OK, just in case anyone else runs into problems after removing tons of snapshots with <=0.67.11, what's the plan to get them going again until 0.67.12 comes out? Install the autobuild package from the wip branch? Cheers, Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
