On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Alphe Salas <asalas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Real field testings and proof workout are better than any unit testing ... I > would follow Dan s notice of resolution because it based on real problem and > not fony style test ground. That statement is almost an insult to the authors and maintainers of the testing framework around Ceph. Therefore, I'm taking the liberty to register my objection. That said, I'm not sure that wip-9487-dumpling is the final fix to the issue. On the system where I am seeing the issue, even with the fix deployed, osd's still not only go crazy snap trimming (which by itself would be understandable, as the system has indeed recently had thousands of snapshots removed), but they also still produce the previously seen ENOENT messages indicating they're trying to trim snaps that aren't there. That system, however, has PGs marked as recovering, not backfilling as in Dan's system. Not sure if wip-9487 falls short of fixing the issue at its root. Sage, whenever you have time, would you mind commenting? Cheers, Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
