centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Actually ... Red Hat changed their numbering system to be like ours ... and if you look at their lastest release announcements you will see 5.1 and 5.2 :DOn Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5.I think that the problem is the naming/numbering convention. If CentOS would follow the same naming convention as RH, some people would be less confused. For the rest of us: Thanks for the great job
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
