centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 > Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... > > and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are > > really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5. > > I think that the problem is the naming/numbering convention. If CentOS > would follow the same naming convention as RH, some people would be > less confused. You mean like 5.1, 5.2 and so on? Yeah, that really would be better. Ralph
Attachment:
pgpFlLgaRALer.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
