On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... > and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are > really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5. I think that the problem is the naming/numbering convention. If CentOS would follow the same naming convention as RH, some people would be less confused. For the rest of us: Thanks for the great job -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos