On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 17:07 +0100, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> William L. Maltby a écrit :
>
> >
> > It looks like it will take about 13 hours to download. I'm afraid I
> > would soak up your outgoing bandwidth. If I don't hear from you in an
> > hour or so, I'll kill it.
> >
> I'm hosting this on a publicly available server, and sometimes, download
> speeds are throttled. But 13 hours seems excessive to me. I'm using my
> own repo to install various client machines in geographically distinct
> places (France and Austria), and the average speed is about 40 kbps (it
> can be much more, though). As for "sucking the bandwidth", don't bother,
> it's not "my" server, it's public FTP and not my machine. Go ahead.
As I mentioned, things sped up considerably. I got 3 installed, after
removing the 2 that was on there (Karan, the 1.* from original install
is still there so I s/b OK when the new release comes out), got the
plugins done (esp. Java and its console for an app that is fairly
importatnt to me - means I don't have to do Winblows) and looks pretty
good.
It picked up my old user config stuff OK and worked well.
Only observed problem seem to be with a screen layout on a certain
website. Some "tabs" it presents are partially hidden and no amount of
<CTL>+<-|+> will make them visible enough to read completely. I'll have
to browse in settings a bit and see if there is something there that
might cure that problem.
But it'll do what I can use it for.
I've got to say thanks.
I'll post more to this thread if I see any other adverse behavior.
Cable system acting up today - wasted some hour or so on the horn with
tech support.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Niki
> <snip sig stuff>
Again, thanks for the contribution.
--
Bill
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
