On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 17:43 -0700, Dan Kohn wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Robert Schweikert > <robert.schweikert at mathworks.com> wrote: > > Not trying to be nit picky but this sounds like the server profile we > > briefly discussed. I think if we call the profile embedded it could be > > confused with a profile for embedded/mobile devices and those of course may > > have gtk+, qt, etc. > > I prefer calling it Embedded to Server, because many servers > (including SLES and RHEL) support all of the graphical libraries, such > as for stateless clients. It's a bit macabre, but I would prefer > calling it 3.2 Headless to 3.2 Server, which at least makes clear that > there's no windowing system. Embedded and Mobile generally mean very > different things in the market today, so I would stick with Embedded, > as I don't believe there will be any confusion. Not try to defocus the discussion at all, but from a strictly practical point of view, I have to say that "headless" most effectively describes the area were looking at with this profile. I do agree it's macabre and probably not what we want to call it, but that is how I refer to these targets when I'm discussing them with other developers. It's a pretty convenient short-hand. Joe MacDonald, Member of Technical Staff, Wind River direct 613.270.5750 mobile 613.291.7421 fax 613.592.2283 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lf_carrier/attachments/20080417/1fd1bee4/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lf_carrier/attachments/20080417/1fd1bee4/attachment.pgp