Not trying to be nit picky but this sounds like the server profile we briefly discussed. I think if we call the profile embedded it could be confused with a profile for embedded/mobile devices and those of course may have gtk+, qt, etc. Robert Dan Kohn wrote: > I've covered this verbally with many folks, but I'd like to officially > propose to the list an LSB 3.2 Embedded Profile. This is an > additional certification profile exactly equal to LSB 3.2, except that > no tests need be passed from the X, qt, or gtk libraries. The only > distributions that may be certified as LSB 3.2 Embedded are those that > ship neither the qt nor gtk libraries. I.e., enterprise distros need > to pass the regular the LSB 3.2 certification. > > The purpose of this new profile is for Carrier Grade Linux > distributions, which are required to pass the LSB as part of > registering as CGL 4.0 compliant. Otherwise, they are forced to > register under LSB 3.0, which is the last version of the LSB without > the graphics libraries. The LF would like to only have to actively > maintain the LSB 3.2 test infrastructure, plus the LSB 4.0 tools > currently under development. Plus, there were a significant number of > bugs fixed between LSB 3.0 and LSB 3.2, and 3.2 is able to make use of > the dramatic improvement in test infrastructure. > > For now, LSB 3.2 Embedded Profile Certifications can use the existing > Distribution Testkit Manager, and just request waivers on all > graphical libraries. In the future, we'll update those tools to > choose between 3.2 regular and 3.2 Embedded Certification. The LF is > also very open to creating new profiles to match up to the libraries > in the current mobile initiatives, including LiMo, Android, and > Moblin. > > Thanks. > > -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU (robert.schweikert at mathworks.com) LINUX The MathWorks Inc. Phone: 508-647-2042