okay then, lets speculate.
How much would it cost?
Kare
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote:
People with the money haven't put it out for a browser like that and won't
put the money out for a browser like that. That's why it hasn't and won't
happen. Putting a browser together like that would need a development
team and not only for the interface there's security considerations
requirements and patching that will have to happen into the future for any
such project. That needs dollars or some other currency to attract and
pay development team and give them enough money that this new project
remains their only project for long enough to get the project to first
release.
-- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in
defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that
order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Chime,
And that is something I do not personally understand.
freedos and djppp, both editions of DOS still under development are not kept
there by individuals using adaptive technology.
Instead, they are there because many people want choice.
Elinks when compiled with the options, provides a blending of the graphical
and the text. paypal is treating it as my default device for one of my
accounts, no more captcha.
Links can create the best of both worlds as well.
So why is there not a port of Thunderbird or another email tool that blends
the best too?
Creates enough of a progressive enhancement factor i. e. basic html, then
builds upon that for interfacing? That helps mobile users who are not all able
to get apple or are unhappy with android items.
Kare
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Chime Hart wrote:
Well Karen-and-All, I think there are no non-graphical ThunderBird
applications, so I wouldn't think that would be an option for those of us in
a straight commandline shell.
Chime