Hi, coscell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, le Thu 08 Mar 2007 11:48:41 +0800, a écrit : > > > If it work fine, the output will longer than original. > > It is indeed. > > Let's check it: > Original words: 高生旺 > Correctly contracted patterns: k%'iz'_" > Is it true in yours? Mmm, this is typically a case where being able to type "unicode raw braille patterns" would be useful, because what I can read (as a sighted user) is just letters and ponctuations, and what blind people can read (in braille) is the "same", but with their _own_ braille representation (remember that for instance '%' is not represented the same in different languages). So, which braille table are you using for typing this? Or alternatively, could you rather express the braille dots like below: >From reading brltty's big5.ctb, your word should be contracted into (13)(146)(3) (24)(1356)(3) (456)(5). This looks like what you said with the NABCC translation table. I'll check this at runtime later. Samuel _______________________________________________ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list