Oh, I thought in addition to that the new content of the message goes at the end of the file after the quoted material. At 07:09 PM 1/5/03 -0500, you wrote: >On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 05:08:25PM -0600, Brent Harding wrote: >> I wonder why it is that the so called proper way to quote is to put your >> stuff at the end? It's the most annoying thing because most email clients >> default to quoting after the new stuff. > >Who says it's proper? Only places I know of that expect it are >blindness lists. The proper way to quote (per long-established >nettiquette) is to quote only relevant parts--not whole messages--not >messages quoting messages--not cascades--only the relevant parts. If >quoting is not relevant, it should (per long-established nettiquette) >be eliminated. >-- >Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV/3 | "And if the ground yawned, >Phone: (814) 455-7333 | I'd step to the side and say, >Email: davros@ycardz.com | "Hey ground! I'm nobody's lunch!" >http://www.ycardz.com/ | --Eddie From Ohio > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Blinux-list@redhat.com >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >