Janina Sajka <janina@afb.net> wrote: (2002/06/14 03:37:00) >Perhaps, but it lacks one very salient ingrediant. It doesn't >have community consensus as W3C html does. And, as has been >noted, the only accessible authoring tools which produce RTF are >on Windows. So, I'm disappointed by Book Share on this point. > >Perhaps it generates better looking text. But, I don't believe >RTF supports structure quite markup anywhere as well as html >does. Since Book Share supports DAISY, at least in theory, it >would seem that structural markup should win out over good looks. > Not entirely true , rtf is also handled by non-MS systems , also it should be possible to provide direct parsing in text to speech systems and in drivers for electromechanical character-cell displays Another candidate is .pwd wich is ANSI-based and used on the PocketPC platform Comments welcome k