Re: RAID 0 reports errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As far as I know, I setup only primary partitions with fdisk.
What did you mean by "second half" of the logical RAID ? How do I check that
? But I don't think there is a logical RAID with this ATARAID.

Sylvain
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: RAID 0 reports errors


> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:30:25PM +0100, Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
> > Well, I'm using a third drive where redhat7.2 with 2.4.16 is installed
to
> > build a linux-of-my-own on the RAID 0 array(with the first partition as
> > windows XP). Well... when booting on this "spare" drive, I noticed
exactly
> > the same thing than you: the first drive of the array (hde in my case)
has
> > some troubles that slows down the system in a terribly manner. You can
> > verify it after somewhere in the /proc filesystem, you have a pdc20xxx
> > file(probably a HTPxxx in your case) that releaved what you said, the
first
> > drive is not "optimised"(DMA is disabled for instance) but the second
drive
> > is ok.
>
> I wonder. Does anyone have an extended partition table which is located in
> the "second half" of the logical raid ?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list

 
______________________________________________________________________________
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Mapper]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [Yosemite Campgrounds]     [AMD 64]

  Powered by Linux