Re: Dmarc failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 12/30/22 18:13, Polarian wrote:
Hello,

Well it depends, DMARC requires both, but a more strict DMARC will


You may be right and I could be wrong but I don't think it works that way. Note in particular sections 3.1 and 4.2 of rcf7489 [1]. The latter reads in part "at least one" (not both):

   A message satisfies the DMARC checks if at least one of the supported
   authentication mechanisms:

   1.  produces a "pass" result, and
   2.  produces that result based on an identifier that is in alignment

Anyway - we've drifted a bit off topic from the original dmarc vs mailing list to 'how does dmarc really work'.

regards,

gene

[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7489



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux