Re: Dmarc failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 12/29/22 11:08, Polarian wrote:
Thats for the suggestion but DKIM is not the problem, I have inspected 1) You mentioned in your first post:
> in a select few cases the DKIM signature was tampered with according to the reports...

It was that phrase that I wondered if the earlier post on 7 bit mailers may be germane.

2) None of the posts I just looked at show any spf check at all once the message leaves lists.archlinux.org.

Headers show archlinux mailer validated spf on your inbound message to archlinux (same for mine) - but the outbound mail I only see dkim (pass) but no spf check at all when message arrives from archlinux.

Do you see any SPF in Authentication-Results headers or nothing?
I do indeed see lists.archlinux.org has an SPF record and the message does arrive with same IP as spf designated sender - I too am a bit perplexed why no SPF check happens - here anyway. dmarc doesn't fail since dkim passes and spf is silent it seems.

I may be slow today but why is there no SPF validation?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux