On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> meh whatever :-) i guess i don't really care anyway since i would >> never run an older one, but i thought there was a technical reason for >> the split originally ... though that reason is escaping me now >> (providing said reason even existed and im not just fabricating it). > > It may have made sense to have both kernel24 and kernel26 in the > repos, but with the new kernel development model (starting with 2.6.0) > it is not expected that we will need anything like that again. ahhh right right, i forgot about the even/odd thing -- thanks Tom. C Anthony
