On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xxxxxxx> wrote: > meh whatever :-) i guess i don't really care anyway since i would > never run an older one, but i thought there was a technical reason for > the split originally ... though that reason is escaping me now > (providing said reason even existed and im not just fabricating it). It may have made sense to have both kernel24 and kernel26 in the repos, but with the new kernel development model (starting with 2.6.0) it is not expected that we will need anything like that again. -t
