On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26` >> package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't >> around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package? or is this >> a non-issue? > > We no longer support linux 2.4... How would this be an issue? sorry i wasn't clear -- i meant when the time comes that dual support would be desirable, eg. linux 4.7 or whatever :-) C Anthony
