On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xxxxxxx> wrote: > ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26` > package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't > around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package? or is this > a non-issue? We no longer support linux 2.4... How would this be an issue? -t
