Re: Another rant on arch way abuse and false promises

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to
>>> the
>>> arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i will add that
>>> to
>>> the next iteration.
>>
>> Assuming you meant "packages to the tracker that DON'T adhere to the
>> arch way", then that is fine. Assuming of course it isn't just a bug
>> report saying "package foobar doesn't adhere to the arch way". I'd
>> hope there's be some "why" and "how to fix" parts
>
> my sentence was stating exactly that,  condensed and in inverse order.
> i was saying, i will post my fixed packages, which i manage downstream
> anyway.
>
> Let me know if this bugformat works for you:
>
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17341

Looks ok to me. Thanks.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux