On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Aaron Griffin wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to >>> the >>> arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i will add that >>> to >>> the next iteration. >> >> Assuming you meant "packages to the tracker that DON'T adhere to the >> arch way", then that is fine. Assuming of course it isn't just a bug >> report saying "package foobar doesn't adhere to the arch way". I'd >> hope there's be some "why" and "how to fix" parts > > my sentence was stating exactly that, condensed and in inverse order. > i was saying, i will post my fixed packages, which i manage downstream > anyway. > > Let me know if this bugformat works for you: > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17341 Looks ok to me. Thanks.
