Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to the
arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i will add that to
the next iteration.
Assuming you meant "packages to the tracker that DON'T adhere to the
arch way", then that is fine. Assuming of course it isn't just a bug
report saying "package foobar doesn't adhere to the arch way". I'd
hope there's be some "why" and "how to fix" parts
my sentence was stating exactly that, condensed and in inverse order.
i was saying, i will post my fixed packages, which i manage downstream
anyway.
Let me know if this bugformat works for you:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17341
--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies
