On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to the > arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i will add that to > the next iteration. Assuming you meant "packages to the tracker that DON'T adhere to the arch way", then that is fine. Assuming of course it isn't just a bug report saying "package foobar doesn't adhere to the arch way". I'd hope there's be some "why" and "how to fix" parts
