On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Giovanni Scafora wrote: >> >> 2009/12/1, Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> When I started on here the mantra was "Arch is what you make it". >>> Packagers strive to make packages which are as vanilla as possible >>> (without breaking) and provide the utility expected of such packages. Of >>> course, if you want a system without hal/dbus, there's ABS and AUR. I >>> don't see why your dislike of particular implementations implies that >>> every user of Arch should forgo those implementations. >> >> I totally agree here. >> >> > > glad we all agree on that :) > i'm about to post packages which work for both of us. They have been > stripped of dbus and happen to be the upstream default. Oh, I misread the intent previously. I was expecting bug reports of the form "foo is broken, remove X and Y", but you're actually planning on posting new-and-improved PKGBUILDs? It might be nice to include diffs in that case, so it's easier to see what was done on a change-by-change basis.
