On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:47:17AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i think Cliff verified that the other part of the change was no longer > needed in his testing, so reverting the whole patch is fine. we've > done that in the Blackfin tree. So, the first part of the patch was applying constraints. You definitely want to do that with your current implementation - the hw_params() function will completely ignore the parameters set for the second substream so unless you use constraints the second application will get a configuration it didn't ask for which isn't going to work so well. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
