On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:26:34PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > it could be. i was going by the changes that werent in 2.6.30. i > thought i looked for previous submissions, but i must have missed > previous attempts. i'm not familiar with alsa stuff, so i'm not The patch hadn't previously been sent in that form but it looks like it's attempting to fix a bug which had had some previous goes at fixing it that required updates. > always sure when i need to bang on Cliff to get things fixed up > (changes split / better comments / etc...). If you're not sure there's a case for better changelogs at least! :) > if fixes miss a merge window, then that's an issue. but in general, > users only see fixes per release, so sending things more quickly there > wouldnt really help ? The issue is that things are missing merge windows - they're getting sent in but if there's any review comments a revised version of the patch isn't getting posted until the next batch of submissions. It's these revisions rather than the initial submissions that I'm concerned about. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
